What Is the 'dominant Model' of British Policy Making? Comparing Majoritarian and Policy Community Ideas

The aim of this article is to help identify the fundamental characteristics of the British policymaking system. It highlights an enduring conflict of interpretation within the literature. On the one hand, most contemporary analysts argue that the ‘Westminster model’ is outmoded and it has been replaced by modern understandings based on ‘governance’. On the other, key ideas associated with the Westminster Model, regarding majoritarian government and policy imposition, are still in good currency in the academic literature which holds firm to Lijphart’s (1984; 1999) description of the UK as a majoritarian democracy. These very different understandings of British government are both commonly cited, but without much recognition that their conclusions may be mutually incompatible. To address this lack of comparison of competing narratives, the article outlines two main approaches to describe and explain the ‘characteristic and durable’ ways of doing things in Britain: the ‘policy styles’ literature initiated by Richardson in Policy Styles in Western Europe (1982) and the Lijphart account found in Democracies (1984) and revised in 1999 as Patterns of Democracy. The article encourages scholars to reject an appealing compromise between majoritarian and governance accounts. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in British Politics. The definitive publisher-authenticated version British Politics (2013) 8, 233–259, is available online at: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/bp/journal/v8/n3/full/bp20135a.html